Piczo

Log in!
Stay Signed In
Do you want to access your site more quickly on this computer? Check this box, and your username and password will be remembered for two weeks. Click logout to turn this off.

Stay Safe
Do not check this box if you are using a public computer. You don't want anyone seeing your personal info or messing with your site.
Ok, I got it
Back To Home Page
ANTENNA
EI3GUB
EI3GUB
EI3GUB
EI3GUB
EI3GUB
ei3gub
My new text...
EI3GUB
WINDOM ANTENNA
I'm using homebrew Windom-Antenna recently.
In the total length of this antenna is 41m, height is about 11m, and diameter of element is 2mm.
However, it is up only about 4m height from a metallic roof.
I modified this antenna originally used as Inverted-V type of 80m band Dipole a little.
The feeding point of this antenna is located 13.6m from the edge of Element. Yes, it is Off-Centered.
BALUN of making which uses two cores, converts impedance into 1/4. The core is the one of about 4cm in the diameter. so there's no problem in the input power 100W at all. Because two cores are used, I think as much as 500W safe in power.
The diameter of the wire rolled in the core is about 1mm.
The VSWR to frequency is shown as follows.

Freq. VSWR Freq. VSWR Freq. VSWR Freq. VSWR
3.525 1.1 14.050 1.8 18.070 3 28.150 2.5
3.570 1.4 14.100 1.7 18.160 3 28.500 2.0
3.795 1.6 14.150 1.6 21.050 >3 29.000 1.3
7.030 1.4 14.200 1.3 21.449 >3 29.300 1.1
7.060 1.3 14.349 1.2 - - 29.600 1.2
7.099 1.2 - - - - 29.699 1.3

In 21MHz, VSWR exceeds 3. However it is likely to QSO with the domestic area, if Antenna-Tuner is used. I did not obtain good results though I measured its VSWR with 10MHz and 24MHz besides .
I think this easy structural wire antenna is Very FB. Because I can QRV on multi BANDs without switching some antennas.
This aerial can be manufactured in two versions:

1) Full size with an overall length (L) of 41 m. In this case the "L1" is 27.5 m and the "L2" is 13.5 m.

2) Half size with an overall length of 20.5 meters. L1= 13.75 & L2 = 6.75 m
ATTENTION: the small version works only for 10, 20 & 40 meter Bands.


Actually, this antenna is compromise but in practice works very well ! On the other hand is a simple-wire multiband antenna, it can be manufactured very easily from anyone and that is a great advantage. I have on my QTH the small version for a couple of years and the results are very good. On 40 m band the antenna is about -6 Db (1 S) lower of a full size dipole but in practice it has the same behavior on locals and DX stations. On 20 meter Band the antenna is excellent. The multi lobe radiation pattern of antennas giving excellent results and its much - much better than a dipole
Can You Say "SATURATION"?

The antenna, as originally installed, had two wires (the top two in the image below). In this configuration, the Windom is advertised to work on all bands but NOT on 15 meters. But it heard GREAT on 15 meters, and I have a tuner, so a little SWR's not a problem, right? Wrong. Most Baluns that I saw advertised on the Internet warn about power limits. They are rated at whatever limit on SSB - and generally tell you to forget about AM and RTTY. But I figured that a Balun that's rated at 1KW on SSB should play fine with 100 watts on CW, even with a little SWR, right? Wrong. The antenna loaded up fine on 15 meters with the tuner, but after about 15 minutes of CW operation I noticed the SWR meter going nuts, and retuning wouldn't work. Whoppie. Now we've melted the 1KW Balun with 100 watts, and the contest is over. Not so. After about 10 or 15 minutes, the Balun cooled off again and I was back in business, but staying away from 15 meters.

I remembered seeing an old 40 meter dipole out in the garage, which was just about the right length for the additional two wires that were advertised to make 15 meters one of "ALL" the bands again, so a quick trip to the back yard with a tape measure, a ball of string, and the old 40 meter dipole produced the second set of necessary wires on the feedpoint to enable 15 (and supposedly 30) meter operation. Here's the final configuration:



It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that since the feed point of the antenna is only 25 feet high, the ends of the two shorter wires are a lot closer to the ground than what they probably should be - maybe 2 feet higher than my six foot fence. Which may account for the high SWR on 30 meters. But with the addition of the second set of wires, 15 had become very usable, and the SWR on 15 and 20 was low enuff so I could pop back and forth between those two bands without even bothering with the tuner.

The antenna is obviously too low, but even at this height it's very usable on all bands but 30 meters. SWR on the bands as it's installed now:

3.800 - 1.5:1
7.000 - 2.2:1
10.125 - 3.4:1
14.000 - 1.9:1
18.110 - 1.5:1
21.100 - 1.5:1
24.900 - 1.4:1
28.500 - 2.1:1
The page describes a Windom antenna with a 4:1 homebrew transformer. The feed-point of this type of antennas (off center) has an impedance of about 300 Ohms. With a 4:1 Balun transformer is possible to feed easily by using a coaxial cable of 75 Ohms (300/4=75), like RG59 or RG11. In practice, under this condition we have an SWR ratio of 1:1,5, but that is no problem if your transceiver has an internal Antenna Tuner. The SWR 1:1,5 it can be easily minimized by using the antenna tuner.
The antenna works on all bands between 3.5 - 28 MHZ including WARC bands other than 10.1 MHZ. The accepted power with this balun is 300 W and the SWR is quite low, not more than 2:1 at the band edges. FIG. 2 shows the Balun transformer.
NEW Carolina Windom shown cut for 40, 20, 15 and 10 meters.
It will operate on 80, 30, and 17 meters but
will require a tuner for these bands.

This more recent, New Carolina Windom, version has some very interesting characteristics as seen in the drawing above.
For one, the 4:1 Balun has been moved to the antenna radiator and is built into the center insulator. The other interesting feature is that the 10 feet of coax from the Balun is terminated in a choke or line isolator. I have fitted the 10 foot stub with PL-259 UHF connectors on each end. This allows the coax vertical radiator to be easily removed if desired. It is designed to hang vertically which is one reason why this antenna is so effective. The radiation pattern when using the vertical radiator combines both horizontal and vertical radiation components and lowers the effective angle of radiation getting more of your signal near the horizon.
EI-3-GUB
ei3gub

Padraigh
EI3GUB
SLIM JIM ANTENNA PROJECT
Several designs rolled into one
Edited and condensed from various designs
Page updated with new information
The Slim Jim Antenna
The Slim Jim is a vertically polarized omnidirectional end-fed antenna having considerable "gain" and this is concentrated almost parallel to ground toward the horizon rather than skyward making it more efficient than a ground plane type antenna by about 50 percent better. It can be built for almost any frequency!
( Below 10 meters it gets VERY tall )
Due to it's SLIM design, there is very little wind loading.
It is fed with 50 ohm coax.

It uses a 'J ' type matching stub (J Integrated Matching = JIM), hense the name SLIM JIM. Credit for the original design goes to F.C. Judd, G2BCX. Since the vertical angle of radiation is so narrow, about 8 degrees toward the horizon, it usually out performs 5/8 wave or groundplane type construction due to their much higher angle of radiation. It is estimated that the Slim Jim appears to have about 6dB gain over a 5/8 wave antenna due to the extreme low angle of radiation.
(Most of the radiation is directed toward the horizion making the "gain" appear much greater than other vertical type antennas it has been compared to with A/B testing)
Editor's note: There are many gain figures quoted for this antenna and also various descriptions of the actual type of antenna on various websites.
Some have even stated that, "In fact I found it outperformed a 1/2wave over 1/2wave over 1/2wave colinear!"
No matter what you call it, it seems to do an excellent job according to most reports. What have you got to loose?
Please let us know your results.....email us!
n4ujw AT hamuniverse.com
Using heavy duty construction would make this a good omni repeater antenna. When correctly matched for lowest swr, it has wide bandwidth.




Drawing on right shown with antenna mounted on PVC pipe



Construction details:
NOTE: NO PART OF THIS ANTENNA SHOULD BE GROUNDED!
It should be totally insulated from it's mount, mast, tower, etc with at least 1/4 wavelength of "freespace" distance. Formulas are provided below for all the measurements including the freespace distance.
The Slim Jim should be constructed from 1/2" copper pipe. Also old tv antenna elements or aluminum tubing could be used with some ingenuity and would be lighter. Experimentation with heavy guage wire supported inside PVC tubing or attached to insulated material such as wood could also be tried and would probally be successful with some ingenuity. 300 ohm twinlead versions also work great!

Using copper pipe, bends are made with soldered 90 degree copper elbows. An adjustable slip sleave made from copper can be added to the element on top above the gap for tuning purposes or possibly some sort of nut, bolt arrangement soldered into the upper end to adjust spacing if needed. (See the 2 meter SSB loop project on this site for better details and pictures of the nut, bolt arrangement.)  
Depending on the frequency or band, the average length of the gap and spacing between the elements is 3" at 72MHz and 1" at 220MHz. (See updates below) For 2 meter work this would be around 1 1/2 to 2 inches.
Some experimenters report about 1 inch or less works well. Experiment with the adjustment for best results. The recommended mount is the use of   PVC pipe and PVC pipe "T's."

Testing and tuneup:
Support the antenna as high as possible from the ground and other nearby objects especially metal, and fit the coaxial cable to the antenna with some crocodile (alligator) clips. It is suggested that the center conductor be attached to the longest element, shield to the shortest. See diagram above. Attach about 2 to 4 inches up from the bottom and check the VSWR at the design frequency.
USE LOW POWER!
Adjust the clips up or down to get the best match, mark where they are to be finally installed, remove the clips, and solder the coax directly or use clamps, screws, etc. Waterproof or seal all connections and the end of the coax. Use the copper sleeve or nut bolt arrangement, if added, for any necessary tuning.



FORMULAS
(For results in inches)

NOTE: Air gap and element spacing may have to be determined by some experimentation for various frequencies.
See new info about gap spacing below.


(Divide results by 12 for feet)
3/4 wave (longest section = 8415 / fMHz = inches
1/2 wave section   = 5610 / fMHz = inches
1/4 wave section   = 2805 / fMHz = inches
* 1/4 wave freespace = 2953 / fMHz = inches          
* This is the distance that antenna should be
from mounting   boom, mast or tower.
Note: These formulas are believed to be accurate.
Some trimming or tweaking of lengths may be needed with YOUR construction!

Slim Jim Metric Formulas:
(For results in meters)
Updated June, 2006
(For results in Centimeters, multiply results by 100)

213.74 / fmhz     = 3/4 wave overall length
142.496 / fmhz   = 1/2 wave length
71.248 / fmhz     = 1/4 wave length
Feed point = About 10 to 20% of 1/4 wavelength (+ - tuning)
75 / fmhz = 1/4 wave "freespace" in Meters
Note: These formulas are believed to be accurate. Some trimming
or tweaking of lengths may be needed with YOUR construction!

Some Examples
2 Meters 146.00mhz
3/4 wave section   8415 divided by 146 = 57.63 inches
1/2 wave section   5610 divided by 146.00 = 38.42 inches
1/4 wave section   2805 divided by 146.00 = 19.21 inches
1/4 wave freespace   2953 divided by 146.00 = 20.22 inches
Feed point about 10 to 20% of 1/4 wave =     1.9 to 3.84 inches (+ - tuning)
The gap would be a guestimate at about 1 1/2 to 2 inches (+ - tuning)
Remember, the 1/4 wave freespace is the distance from the mount
as a minumum.

6 Meters 50.150mhz
8415 / 50.150mhz = 167.79 inches
5610 / 50.150mhz = 111.8 inches
2805 / 50.150 = 55.93 inches
Gap spacing 10 to 20% of 1/4 wave = 8 inches (15%)
Freespace mounting distance 58.8 inches

10 Meters 28.400mhz
8415 / 28.4mhz = 296.30 inches (24.69 feet)
5610 / 28.4 = 197.5 inches (16.45 feet)
2805 / 28.4 = 98.76 inches (8.23 feet)
Freespace mounting distance 103.97 inches (8.66 feet)

17 Meters!
A 52 foot vertical including minimun distance from ground!
Hay don't laugh! It might be worth a try for about 6 db more!
The lengths will have to be adjusted slightly for the addition of the top and bottom connection points.
See Construction and Testing tips below.

CONSTRUCTION and TESTING TIPS

CONSTRUCTION:
=============
The Slim Jim should be constructed from 1/2" copper pipe OR near this size of any conductive material but this is not an absolute! The bends are made with soldered 90 degree copper elbows if your using copper tubing.
  A slip sleave or other arrangement can be added to the upper or lower part of the gap made from copper, brass or aluminum for adjustment of the gap measurement for swr tuning, although the average length of the gap and spacing between the elements is 3" at 72MHz and 1" at 220MHz. Some experimentation may be needed for gap distance.

For 2 meters, this would be about 1 1/2 to 2 inches. Here again, this measurement is not extremly critical and the gap, element spacing and element length all interact.
The total distance from the top of the gap around the entire length and back to the bottom of the gap should equal about 1.5 wavelengths or in the case of the 2 meter example above about 115.26 inches.
No part of the antenna should be grounded to the tower or mast.   The
recommended mount is the use of PVC pipe and PVC pipe "T's."  
Make sure the space between the tower or mast and the antenna is one "freespace" 1/4 wavelength.

TESTING:
========
Stand upright (on a railing or non-conductive object, clear of metal surfaces,
drain pipes, etc.) and fit the coaxial cable to the antenna with some crocodile (alligator) clips.   Attach about 2 to 4 inches up from the bottom (at 2 meters). It is suggested that the center conductor be attached to the longest element, shield to the shortest and using just enough power to get an swr reading, check the VSWR. Adjust the clips up or down to get the best match, mark where they are attached, remove the clips, and solder the coax directly.   Seal connections and end of coax!
Use the copper sleeve, or other spacing adjustment if added, for any necessary tuning. You may not get that perfect 1:1! The air gap, total length and element spacing all interac,

I was looking for a simple omni-directional antenna. Then happend to see ur slimjim design and tech details.

Immediately brewed one as follows:

Freq:   145 Mhz ( being our center   freq. in VHF )

PVC Pipe support:   32 MM Dia.

Ant. Eliment : 15 SWG Copper Enamilled.

Gaps and spacings used :   152,   98.3 , 49.2 CM

                              Gaps:   1.1/2"   Feed Point:   2"   Gr . Clearance:
When your 16 year old neighbor buys an old Navaho base station and asks you (the local CB guru of the block) what would be a good, cheap, starter antenna for him, you suggest the A99.

This same scenario has been played out in different variations thousands of times over the years. At some point almost everyone who has been involved in CB radio has owned an A99 or suggested one to a friend.

The A99 is the antenna of choice for first timers and is used by many old timers on a daily basis. Many people have complained about this antenna being poorly made, yet it still continues to be widely popular. It’s a simple design and perhaps one of the best selling and most commonly used citizen band base station antennas ever.

The A99 antenna originally was manufactured and sold under the “Antron” brand name. These days the antenna is built and sold by “Solarcon”. The Solarcon A99 is a half wave over a quarter wave variable mutual inductance antenna designed for use on the 11 meter CB band. This antenna is often advertised as having a dBi gain of 9.9 which I believe to be highly exaggerated. Many people have done thorough testing and examinations of this antenna and have determined that the claim of 9.9 dBi is not accurate.


Probably the best examination of this antenna was done by Tech 833 and was documented in his well known article “The Antron 99 EXPOSED!”. In this review he actually took apart the A99 and displayed all of the individual components of the antenna for everyone to see. To better understand how the A99 functions and how it is made this article is a great read.

But in our article we’re not doing a review of the A99, we want to talk about why this antenna is so popular among CBer’s and is even touted by many Hams.

PUTTING UP AN ANTENNA

Buying a CB radio and plugging it into the wall isn’t too difficult. Running coax along a wall and out a window or a small hole isn’t a very tough task either. The real work when setting up your base station takes place when you have to install your base station antenna.

Perhaps this is one of the reasons the A99 has become a favorite beginner antenna and also popular with those who don’t have the time to install an antenna tower or other more complicated antenna mounts or systems.

The A99 is roughly 18’ feet long and is made of 3 fiberglass sections which screw together. Inside the shell the actual radiating element of the antenna is just a 16 awg wire.

Its internal design has been described as cheap but this is no way effects its durability. A99 antennas are known to last 10 years or more with little or no ill effects to weather, rain, or cold temperatures. There are of course cases where people have had problems with the quality, but in general the antenna is very durable and long lasting.

The A99 comes with a mounting system that easily attaches to a pole or piece of wood. If you don’t decide to use the provided mounting system I’ve heard of many people using clamps, bungee cords or other simple ways of securing the antenna in place.


Because of its design it has a very high angle of radiation. In most cases if you had a vertical antenna mounted 30-40’ feet in the air this would not be a desired radiation pattern. But most people who buy A99 antennas aren’t mounting them on top of towers or in high locations. As mentioned before most people buying these antennas are beginners or people who just need a cheap, easy to assemble and mount antenna for their base station. Because of these factors you’ll most often see A99 antennas mounted on the side of a house, or off of a back porch or deck, or maybe in a small tree. In many installations the base of the antenna is mounted no higher than 10 feet off of the ground.

With most antennas you want to mount them as high as possible, but because of the A99’s high angle of radiation it still performs very well when mounted at low heights.

Now other antennas of better quality and performance will easily outperform the A99 at pretty much any height, but there are few available that are as cheap, simple, and easy to mount as the A99.

The A99 has a tuning system consisting of two rings that can be moved to adjust SWR. In my experiences these rings really did not do much to affect SWR but that didn’t really matter as most A99’s will tune for less than a 1.5 SWR straight out of the box. While none of my A99 antennas ever achieved a flat 1.1 SWR most were able to achieve a 1.2 to 1.3.

Easy to mount, easy to tune, and very durable. So far the case for the A99 is pretty strong.

WHAT ABOUT PERFORMANCE?

Anyone who has owned a A99 and later switched to a 5/8 wave antenna or a beam antenna will tell you that the A99 doesn’t even come close to performing as well as the latter two. But what they will also tell you is that for the price, size, and simplicity the A99 works surprisingly well.

I’ve never talked to anyone who said the A99 did not perform well for TX or RX. Many people have told me that later they upgraded to a better antenna, but they always maintained that the A99 did an admirable job. This for me has always proved true as well.

I’ve owned two A99 antennas, one made by Antron and the later Solarcon produced model. One of the antennas was mounted in a tree at a height around 70’ and with a small 4 watt Sears Roadtalker Base Radio I was able to talk anywhere within 30 miles without difficulty. I talked skip on a regular basis from Washington to California receiving great reports.

The other A99 that I used recently was mounted 8 feet off of the ground and attached to a fencepost. I wasn’t expecting much, but the antenna allowed me to talk locally for 20 miles with a stock radio and shoot skip when conditions were favorable.

Both antennas performed flawlessly, allowing me to hear all of the local stations without difficulty and transmitting my signal well enough to be heard on the other end.

Two different A99’s antennas, two different scenarios and mounting locations and in both instances the antenna did the basic task for which it was designed.

Yes, so far I’ve made this antenna sounds like the golden egg, but it’s not without faults and some of them can be a big problem.

This antenna is bad for bleed over. In fact of any antenna I’ve ever used it’s the worst. If mounted low to the ground the signal will find its way into your TV, stereo, phone and computer speakers. I have done grounding for one of these antennas to the very best of my ability and it still did not eliminate the bleed over going into my neighbors baby monitor.

If you decide to run power through this antenna in excess of the legal limit I can pretty much guarantee you’re going to see some form of bleed over in your own home and probably also in any homes nearby.

On the topic of power, this antenna is rated by the manufacturer to handle 2000 watts of power. I would never suggest to anyone to try to prove that claim. The largest amount of power I would ever put through this antenna would be 300 watts.

If someone were to run 2000 watts for extended periods of time through one of these antennas I doubt the antenna would last very long. As with the dB gain claims, I think the power handling claims should be taken with a grain of salt.

The last problem I’m aware of with these antennas is that they are reports of shorts occurring in the different sections on occasion resulting in a noticeable increase in SWR.

In spite of the problems one might encounter while using an A99, the real factor as to why these antennas are so popular is undoubtedly the price. I’ve seen these antennas priced as low as $49.90 on eBay not including shipping. At a local CB shop I bought one for $65 + tax. They are one of the least expensive base antennas available.

Often people who are new to the hobby don’t want to spend a lot of money and so the price range of the A99 is no doubt appealing. In addition most used base CB radios can be purchased for under $100 and many people (even experienced CB operators) may not want to blow a whole lot of money on an antenna so they can talk on a $50 CB radio to their friends 5 miles away.

The cheap price also comes into play for Ham radio operators looking for an antenna they can use on 10 and 12 meters. The A99 is broad banded enough where it can do a basic job of transmitting in both of these bands. Many ham radio operators have already invested in antennas for multiple bands and don’t want to shell out hundreds of dollars for another antenna. The A99 has proved to be very versatile and although many Hams agree that it doesn’t compare to more expensive antennas, for the price it performs very well.

SUMMARY

People will complain that its parts are cheap, or that its design is inefficient. They’ll say that the claims by Solarcon of 9.9 dBi gain are over inflated and misleading.

But the A99 keeps working and CB radio operators new and old keep buying them and using them.

We all would love to have a professional looking tower with a 8 element beam with rotor; but the truth is that very few of us have the time or money. The A99 is inexpensive and simple. It fills a niche and does it well, and no one can dispute that claim.

___________________________________________________________________

* I made an inquiry to the makers of the A99 and here was the response from their company president *

The A99 was originally designed and invented by Don Wells. It used a patented tuning technology (the tuning rings) which Mr. Wells already held a patent on. The tuning ring patent was first used on the Solarcon VMT mobile antennas; also call Adjust-A-Match antennas when sold under other brands.



The A99 was manufactured by Don at his company Solarcon in Holland, Ohio . He had a partner who had his own company called Antron. That company did the marketing for the antennas and it’s original name was the Antron99.



Don and his partner had a falling out and they went there separate ways. As part of that settlement Don could no longer use the Antron name and so the antenna became the Solarcon A99. That was sometime in the 80’s.



I came to work for Solarcon as VP operations around 1992 and left in 1995. Don passed away in 1998 and at that time I purchased Solarcon. The legal company name at that time became Tencom Ltd. and Solarcon was the brand name for our CB antennas.



In 2005 Tencom sold the exclusive North American Distribution rights of all Solarcon Antennas to DAS distributors. We still manufacture the Solarcon Antenna line for DAS.



In fact our manufacturing operation is still located in Holland , Ohio in the same buildings that Don originally built the A-99 in all those years ago.



There have been no major design changes to the A-99 since it was first introduced.



Don’s old partner did years later start new antenna company called Anttron (two T’s) which is now gone again.
The Imax 2000 EXPOSED!
Have you ever wondered what was inside the Imax 2000 antenna?

After dissecting the Antron 99 antenna and discovering that its advertising claims were horribly over-exaggerated, I became curious about other fiberglass 'wonder' antennas. An opportunity to dissect the Imax 2000 presented itself, so I accepted.

The first thing you notice about the Imax 2000 is that it is LONG! I measured the copper wire elements after they were removed from their fiberglass radomes:

Bottom section: 80 inches
Middle section: 94 inches
Top section: 96.5 inches


That makes the total radiating element length 270.5 inches. Using 27 MHz. (CB) as center frequency (which this antenna was designed for), that makes the Imax 2000 a 0.640 wavelength antenna. (A 5/8 wave antenna is 0.625 of one wavelength). I was very surprised to find that the Imax 2000 is not a 5/8 wave as advertised. The Imax 2000 is actually a .64 wave! The .64 wave is one of the best kept secrets in CB and 10 meter antennas. Not since the Super Penetrator 500 Gold has there been a .64 wave antenna widely available. A .64 wave antenna is the highest gain single element design there is with 0.4 dB more gain on the horizon (free space) than a 5/8 wave element.

In photo number 1 I have the antenna laid out with the insides alongside the fiberglass shell it was once housed in. Removing the insides from the 2 lower sections was accomplished with a Dremel tool and a cutting wheel. Removing the insides of the upper section required a planer and systematically shaving away fiberglass until I got down to the copper wire inside. I had to determine if there were any coils or anything inside the top section. Instead, it's just a length of stranded copper wire. However, with a .64 wavelength element, adding coils would distort the otherwise clean pattern, so I was glad to find just the wire. The only thing that could improve this antenna would be a counterpoise (ground planes). More on this later.
In photo 2, you see what is inside the lower section and how the tuning rings affect the coil's tuning. Except for the lower 2 feet of the Imax 2000, all the rest of the antenna contains nothing more than a straight piece of #14 bare copper wire. An upgrade from the A99, the Imax 2000 uses RG-213 coaxial cable which connects to the SO-239 connector in the bottom of the mounting pipe and to the coils of the matching section. Just to the right the outer coil is the brass outer 'plate' of the coupling capacitor. The 'twin ring' match works by moving the metal rings closer or further away from the outer coil which changes the inductance and therefore, the resonant frequency of the radiating element.
In photo 3, you can see how the coaxial cable connects to the Imax 2000 feedpoint at the bottom of the coils. There was a small plastic spacer that I removed for the clarity of the photo. Here, you can see that the soldering job was excellent and very electrically secure. Using the brass crimp sleeve seen here helps add a mechanical strength to the solder joint which will help the antenna maintain it's electrical integrity through vibration and temperature fluctuations. The inductance tuning coil in the Imax 2000 is much smaller (and less lossy) than the Antron 99 antenna. The Imax 2000 uses 10 turns of #14 enameled copper wire.
Photo 4 gives you a good view of how the inner impedance matching coil fits inside the outer tuning coil. With the radiator length being .64 wave, the impedance at this point is extremely high. The inner coil provides a 50 ohm tap on the driven element, while the outer coil cancels out the capacitive reactance created by the coupling capacitor and the capacitance at the fed end of the radiator. One of the big secrets to getting a wideband antenna, which many other antenna makers apparently ignore, is completely canceling out the reactance. Even a few ohms of reactance at the feedpoint will greatly reduce the bandwidth. By tuning the reactance to zero, the SWR will be very low over a wide frequency range.
Photo 5 provides a look inside the coupling capacitor viewed from the radiating element end. If you look carefully, you will be able to see the excellent soldering job from the copper wire to the brass inner 'plate' of the capacitor. Here, as in the Antron 99, you also see another brass crimp sleeve used to strengthen the capacitor plate stub to radiator element solder joint. The Imax 2000 is built much better than the Antron 99 reviewed in an earlier article. The attention to solder joints was much better in the Imax 2000, and I was very pleased to see this attention to detail. It makes for a much 'quieter' antenna.
In photo 6, you get a look at the nylon spacer which forms the 'dielectric' of the coupling capacitor. I had to use a great deal of heat to remove the press fit brass sleeve, so some melting of the nylon is evident. There is NO WAY this would come apart by accident! Like the Antron 99 coupling capacitor, when measured with a capacitance meter, I measured a value of 4pF for each end. That's measured radiator-to-sleeve and again from ground-to- sleeve. The Imax 2000 radiating element is capacitively coupled rather than connected directly to the coax to isolate the antenna base from high voltages in case the installer happens to drop it across power lines and the radiator happens to make contact with high voltage.
Photo 7 shows the inside of the capacitor coupling unit with the components alongside each other for spacing reference. A brass cylinder inside the nylon forms the inner conductor or 'plate' of each end of the coupling capacitor. The brass cylinders do not touch each other end to end, there is a small space left which acts like a spark gap in the case of lightning strike to take the charge straight to ground. For a more detailed idea of how this works, check out the schematic diagram below.





CLOSING STATEMENTS: In summary, the Imax 2000 is a very well built and well thought out antenna. It's ironic that the Antron 99 paved the way for this antenna, but the Imax 2000 is head and shoulders above the Antron 99 in engineering practice. So much additional inductance coil is needed in the Antron 99 to get the highly capacitive 1/2 wave element tuned. However, in the Imax 2000, with the .64 wavelength element, the capacitance is much lower, which requires much less inductance to tune it out. Therefore, much less coil is required to tune the Imax 2000 to resonance, which greatly reduces the coil losses.

So what is the TRUE gain of the Imax 2000? Assuming a .64 wave shunt fed dipole in free space, minus the losses associated with the series capacitance and inductance, and minus the necessary counterpoise, according to my math, the Imax 2000 has 2.9 dBi gain. That is to say, the Imax 2000 has 2.9 dB gain on the horizon over an isotropic radiator. Referenced to a center fed 1/2 wave dipole, which is the industry standard, the Imax 2000 has a gain of 0.8 dB. This could also be stated as 0.8 dBd gain. Although adding the Antron GPK-1 ground plane kit will not add much gain to the Antron 99, the ground plane kit would add significant gain on the horizon for the Imax 2000. A .64 wavelength radiator is much more efficient and will have a much lower angle of radiation (keep the signal down on the horizon instead if wasting it up in the sky) with a proper counterpoise system. Adding the GPK-1 to the Imax 2000 (according to my math and previous .64 wavelength test range plots) will result in a 0.3 dB gain improvement. This will bring the Imax 2000's actual gain up to 3.2 dBi (or 1.1 dBd).


For a complete report of the Imax 2000 on the antenna test range compared with and without the ground plane kit added, click on the plot or HERE .


CONCLUSION: The Imax 2000 will easily outperform the Antron 99 and other 1/2 wave antennas like the popular 'Ringo'. Adding the GPK-1 ground plane kit will provide a significant improvement in gain on the horizon, which will noticeably improve local communications. With the wide availability and reasonable price of the Imax 2000, it is easy to suggest this antenna to the 10 and 11 meter enthusiast who desires top performance, and a more visually low profile fiberglass antenna.
Photobucket
My Pages
4354 hits
 
No. of Votes:  61
Avg. Rating:   5.21   
Meter Started: Jan 10, 2007
My new text...
My new text...
How to Check SWR with the radios built in meter

**Note** Generally the built in meters are not all that accurate, however they will get you close if that's all you have.

First of all locate the switches you will need for this test.
1) The S/RF, SWR, Cal switch (A three position switch either a slide or a rotary)
2) The variable "SWR Cal" knob
Then familiarize yourself with the meter and scale.


For this procedure you will only be interested in this scale



Place S/RF, SWR, CAL switch to the "CAL" position
Key the mic on the radio and hold it keyed until noted
Slowly adjust the Variable "SWR Cal" knob until the needle is on the "CAL" mark on the meter


Now place the S/RF, SWR, CAL switch to the "SWR" position
Note the location of the needle (It helps to jot it down on a piece of paper, you may need to do this test a few times more)
Un-key the mic

Ideally you should see a reading of 1.5 or less which would be here
          GOOD

A reading of 2 or less is considered "Safe", (As long as you are not running a "High Power" radio or an External amplifier) which would be here
        SAFE

If your readings are higher than 2, your antenna system needs some attention and you should limit your talking until you get the SWR down
        BAD

Tech Support           Top
e/mail   ei3gub@hotmail.com
 
No. of Votes:  61
Avg. Rating:   5.21   
Meter Started: Jan 10, 2007
My Pages
4354 hits
ANY INFORMATION ,DESIGN, PHOTOGRAPHS,OR OTHER DATA IN THIS WEB SITE IS COPYRIGHT TO THE OWNER EI3GUB AND MAY NOT   BE REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM WHAT SO EVER